Ohmics — automated preliminary screening. Not a stamped engineering review, not an AHJ determination, and not a substitute for the Engineer of Record. Full disclaimer.

OhmicsAI electrical review

AI review · 49-point checklist by a Ph.D., P.E.

AI NEC Pre-Check

A structured pass over your drawings before the plan checker sees them.

From $49
Price shown before you pay
49
Checklist points
1 day
Typical turnaround
This is a preliminary code screening, not a compliance determination.

What it's for

We read your drawing set for the mismatches, marking gaps, and clearance issues a plan checker is likely to flag — before you submit.

Who it's for

Built for the people who sign off

The contractor about to submit for permit

Catch comments now, before the correction cycle starts.

The design engineer sealing the set

Surface schedule-to-one-line mismatches before a plan checker does.

The manager who has to staff the check

Free your senior engineers from paging through panel schedules.

The owner’s representative reviewing a submittal

Know what a reviewer will ask before you sign off on it.

What it doesn't do

Clear limits, stated up front

  • Determining code compliance
  • Substituting for AHJ plan review
  • Arc flash incident energy evaluation (see af-study)
  • Coordination study evaluation (see coordination)

A clean report is never proof of compliance.

Turnaround

What to expect

Automated

Typically 1 business day, plus review time.

Expert-reviewed

Typically 3 business days.

You upload

  • Drawings (PDF)required
  • Local code amendments (optional PDF)optional

What's checked

49 checks across 32 areas

  • Working space and clearances
  • Equipment marking
  • Short-circuit and interrupting ratings
  • Circuit identification
  • Conductor protection
  • Feeder taps
  • Arc energy reduction
  • Equipment location
  • Grounding electrode system
  • Equipment grounding conductors
  • Separately derived systems
  • Bonding
  • Ampacity and adjustment
  • Raceway fill
  • Underground installation
  • Physical protection
  • Fire stopping
  • Overcurrent protection
  • Equipment arrangement
  • Enclosures and environment
  • Motor conductors
  • Motor protection
  • Motor disconnects
  • Transformer protection
  • Transformer installation
  • Transformer disconnects
  • System classification
  • Coordination requirements
  • Circuit separation
  • Generator installation
  • Utility interconnection
  • Drawing set integrity

Sample finding

Available fault current marking not shown at service equipment

Illustrative and redacted. See full sample reports →

The cost of the first pass

Your engineers should be engineering, not proofreading.

The first pass through a document is the slowest, least interesting part of review. We do that pass and hand back a list with every item tied to a page. Your engineer still makes every call.

Defaults to the $300/hr rate PEFG prices its own expert lane from. Change it to yours.

We don't measure this and won't pretend to — the default is deliberately low. Set it to what it actually takes.

Your first pass — 2 hours at $300/hr
$600
AI NEC Pre-Check — Standard
$79
Difference, per document
$521

Turnaround: Typically 1 business day, plus review time.

A preliminary screening, not a substitute for your review. The Engineer of Record verifies every finding, and absence of a finding is never evidence of compliance.

Why it is consistent

Every item, every time

The full checklist runs on every document, even on a deadline.

The same standard every time

Depth does not depend on who was free that afternoon.

An audit trail by default

Every finding carries its page and the checklist item behind it.

It does not get bored

Matching ninety label values to ninety study rows is where people slip.

If this goes wrong

First order, any product: tell us why it missed and we refund it.

Email support within 7 days of release with your order ID and a short note on what it missed. First paid order only, one per customer, refunded in full.

Always refundable, first order or not

  • Wrong document type. If what you uploaded is not a document this product reviews, re-upload the right file or take a full refund.
  • Non-delivery. If we fail to deliver a report, you get a full refund.
  • Before you upload. Paid but not uploaded yet? Email support for a full refund.
  • Malware-rejected with no clean resubmission. If your file fails the malware scan and you cannot send a clean copy, take a refund.

Anything else? Email support with your order ID — a person reads every request. support@pefgconsulting.com. Full terms: refund policy.

Need more than a screening? PEFG offers a stamped engineering review by a licensed P.E.(opens in a new tab, external site) as a separate engagement.

FAQ

Common questions

Why should I upload my jurisdiction’s adopted code and amendments?

Because it is the difference between a citation and an opinion. This is the only one of the six products whose code grounding comes from a document you supply. Upload the adopted edition or your AHJ’s amendments and findings cite the article and section from your document. Upload nothing and the review runs in degrade mode: findings are still produced, but as general engineering observations with no article number and confidence capped at medium. It will never cite a code section from memory.

Is this a code compliance determination?

No, explicitly not. Determining code compliance is reserved to the Authority Having Jurisdiction, and substituting for AHJ plan review is out of scope by design. This flags conditions worth a second look before you submit. Absence of a finding is not evidence of compliance.

Which code edition does it check against?

Whichever one you tell it at intake — NEC 2014 through 2026 — and, where you upload them, your local amendments. Adoption varies enormously by jurisdiction, which is exactly why the edition is a required intake field rather than an assumption.

Who wrote the 49 checks?

Jay R. Prigmore II, Ph.D., P.E. — a Ph.D. electrical power engineer holding twelve state professional engineering licenses and a founding member of the NFPA technical committee on electrical inspection practices. The checklist is original prose describing what to look for; it contains no reproduced NEC text and no numeric thresholds, because thresholds vary by adopted edition.

Does it review arc flash or coordination?

No — those are separate products, deliberately. Incident energy belongs to the AI Arc Flash Study Review and protective device settings belong to the Coordination & Selectivity Review. Buying one does not buy an opinion on the others.

This site uses Google Analytics to see how visitors use it — nothing loads unless you accept. It never sees your uploaded documents, order details, or intake-form answers. See the Privacy Policy.